Skip to content

Comparison of efficacy and safety of combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide + glulisine therapy and intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Comparison of efficacy and safety of combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide + glulisine therapy and intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes - Comparison of efficacy and safety of combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide + glulisine therapy and intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000041551
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-08-25
Start date
2020-08-25
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

type 2 diabetes

Interventions

combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide + glulisine therapy intensive insulin therapy

Sponsors

Minami Osaka Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients who have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes more than 1 year before the start of the study and who have been treated with oral hypoglycemic drugs for more than 6 months before the screening. 2.Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.0% or more and less than 11.0%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with severe gastrointestinal disorders such as severe gastroparesis. 2. Patients with a history of pancreatitis. 3. Patients with a history of severe ketosis, diabetic coma or pre-coma within 6 weeks of starting the study. 4.Patients with severe hypoglycemia (diabetic coma or precoma, convulsion that requires the assistance of a third party) within 6 weeks of starting the study. 5. Patients with severe renal dysfunction (eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.73m2 or serum creatinine level 2.0mg/dL or more) or patients with end-stage renal failure undergoing dialysis. 6. Patients with severe liver dysfunction (AST or ALT higher than 100U/L). 7. Patients with proliferative retinopathy (however, patients with stable symptoms who have undergone photocoagulation, etc. can be enrolled). 8. Pregnant or possibly pregnant women and lactating patients. 9. Patients with severe infections, serious injury before and after surgery. 10. Patients receiving systemic corticosteroids. 11. Patients with a history of allergies to the planned drug used in the study. 12. Patients with or history of malignancy. 13.Other patients who the investigator determined to be inappropriate as a subject.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
efficacy:Percentage of time of the glucose level of euglycemic area (70-179 mg/dl) of flash glucose monitoring (FGM). safety:Percentage of time less than 70 mg/dl (low blood glucose area) of FGM.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The percentage of time of the glucose level of hyperglycemic area (180 mg/dl or more), severe hypoglycemic area (less than 54 mg/dl) and nighttime (0 : 00-5: 59) hypoglycemic area in FGM. Mean blood glucose (24hours, 0:00-6:00, 6:00-18:00, 18:00-24:00), SD value(24hours, 6:00-18:00), CV value(24hours, 6:00-18:00), percentage of time of the glucose level of euglycemic area (70-179 mg/dl of FGM(6:00-24:00), daily variation , M value, MAGE, changes in glycoalbumin levels,period until target blood glucose level is reached and titration is completed.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYuji Kawaguchi

Minami Osaka Hospital Internal Medicine

y.kawaguchi@minamiosaka.com0666850221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026