Skip to content

A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms

A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms - A randomized controlled trial comparing conventional ESD versus hybrid ESD for gastric neoplasms

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000041244
Enrollment
82
Registered
2020-07-29
Start date
2020-08-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric neoplasm

Interventions

When assigned to the standard treatment group (group A), conventional ESD is performed. When assigned to the study treatment group (group B), hybrid ESD is performed.

Sponsors

Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Male or female aged 20 years with early gastric neoplasm who will undergo endoscopic resection as a local treatment -Eligible lesion is diagnosed as a gastric adenoma or adenocarcinoma by endoscopic biopsy within 90 days before enrollment. -Eligible lesion is endoscopically diagnosed as a mucosal lesion within 20 mm in diameter without ulceration. -Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) of each eligible patient is 0, 1, or 2. -Eligible patients will be asked to listen to oral explanation and read explanatory documents providing doctors' instruction and sign consent forms. Informed consent will be obtained from each eligible patient before enrollment in the trial -Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: -Patients with a history of gastric surgery -Patients on dialysis -Patients requiring continuous administration of heparin during perioperative period. -Contraindication with endoscopy; ileus, gastrointestinal perforation or severe respiratory/cardiac disease. -Metal allergy -Patients who are judged inappropriate by physician participating in this trial -Patients who cannot obtain informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Procedure time of ESD

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time and speed of mucosal incision Time and speed of submucosal dissection with or without snaring En bloc and complete resection Curability judged by histological assessment of resected specimen Endoscopic procedural adverse events including intraoperative perforation, delayed perforation and delayed bleeding Degree of dissected submucosal layer before snaring Volume of injective solution Number and time of hemostasis using hemostatic device during procedure Thickness of submucosal layer in resected specimen The relationship between outcomes and morphology / location / size/ ulceration / operator's experience.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMitsuru Esaki

Graduate School of Medicine, Kyushu University Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science

esaki_saiseikai@yahoo.co.jp092-642-5286

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026