Slender sheath/guiding catheter combination versus sheathless guiding catheter for acute coronary syndrome: A propensity-matched analysis of the two devices

Slender sheath/guiding catheter combination versus sheathless guiding catheter for acute coronary syndrome: A propensity-matched analysis of the two devices - Slender transradial PCI for ACS

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 4

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000040498

Enrollment

1100

Registered

2020-05-24

Start date

2015-01-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), including ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation ACS

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ACS patients who underwent transradial PCI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) PCI via femoral or brachial access, (ii) transradial PCI using guiding catheter systems other than 7.5-Fr sheathless Eaucath guiding catheters or 7-Fr Glidesheath slender sheaths/7-Fr Hyperion guiding catheter (Asahi Intecc) combination, (iii) refusal to participate, and (iv) loss of follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The endpoints were radial artery occlusion at 30 days, severe radial spasm during PCI, access-site major bleeding within 30 days as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3 or 5 criteria, coronary ostial dissection by the guiding catheters, and procedural success.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTsuyoshi Isawa

Sendai Kousei Hospital Department of Cardiology

isa_tsuyo@yahoo.co.jp022-222-6181

Outcome results