Skip to content

Comparison of the overall survival of proximal and distal gastric cancer after gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of the OS of PG and DG: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Comparison of the OS of PG and DG: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000040393
Enrollment
6500
Registered
2020-05-13
Start date
2020-03-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

gastric cancer

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

The Dalian Municipal Central Hospital Affiliated of Dalian Medical University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: nclusion criteria: (1) Randomized controlled trials (RCTs)/cohort/observational studies. (2) Comparison of prognosis between PG and DG patients. (3) Recorded at least one of the following effect sizes: 1-year OS, 3-year OS or 5-year OS.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Exclusion criteria: (1) Non-gastric cancer. (2) Failed to include both PG and DG. (3) Too little data information to use. (4) Case reports, reviews and comments. (5) Not after gastrectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactGuo Zu

The Dalian Municipal Central Hospital Affiliated of Dalian Medical University Gastroenterology Surgery

zushanghai@163.com0411-84412001

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026