Comparison of laryngoscopes under the aerosol box for tracheal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study

Comparison of laryngoscopes under the aerosol box for tracheal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequin study - Comparison of laryngoscopes under the aerosol box for tracheal intubation: a randomized crossover mannequinnstudy

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000040269

Enrollment

Registered

2020-04-30

Start date

2020-04-30

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

mannequin

Interventions

Macintosh direct laryngoscope i-view video laryngoscope C-MAC video laryngoscope

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Anesthesiologists with at least 2 years of experience in airway management

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Those who did not get consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken for tracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Success rate of tracheal intubation, subjective difficulty score, incidence of esophageal intubation, Cormack-Lehane score	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactToshiyuki Nakanishi

Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine

nakanishi.anest@gmail.com+81-52-853-8281

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026