FCOI IN LARC
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Furthermore, studies will be included which compare 1) LARCs to each other, 2) LARCs to oral contraceptives or 3) LARCs to nonpharmacologic therapy or placebo. Studies must have outcomes for one or more of the following 1) efficacy, 2) side effects including pain, nausea, weight gain, obesity, or preeclampsia etc 4) adverse events including complications, expulsion, perforation, infection, anemia, and/or bleeding, 5) application/insertion, or 6) promotion of use. Furthermore, to qualify for inclusion, systematic reviews must have been published from September of 2016 through January of 2020. Only systematic reviews published in English and reviews that synthesize studies of human or animal data will be included. Published poster presentations and conference abstracts will be excluded.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: Furthermore, studies will be included which compare 1) LARCs to each other, 2) LARCs to oral contraceptives or 3) LARCs to nonpharmacologic therapy or placebo. Studies must have outcomes for one or more of the following 1) efficacy, 2) side effects including pain, nausea, weight gain, obesity, or preeclampsia etc 4) adverse events including complications, expulsion, perforation, infection, anemia, and/or bleeding, 5) application/insertion, or 6) promotion of use. Furthermore, to qualify for inclusion, systematic reviews must have been published from September of 2016 through January of 2020. Only systematic reviews published in English and reviews that synthesize studies of human or animal data will be included. Published poster presentations and conference abstracts will be excluded.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate potential conflicts of interest of reviewers in systematic reviews focused on long acting reversible contraceptives. | — |
Countries
North America
Contacts
Oklahoma State University CHS