Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis - Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment in Patients with Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000039395

Enrollment

120

Registered

2020-02-05

Start date

2018-12-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

coronary artery disease with severe aortic valve stenosis

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: invasive FFR and CT assessment in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: No exclusion criteria

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived vs Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactFutoshi Yamanaka

Shonan Kamakura General Hospital Department of Cardiology

futoshi-yamanaka@nifty.com0467461717

Outcome results