Safety and efficacy of Bipolar TURBT

Safety and efficacy of monopolar vs bipolar transurethral resection of bladder tumor-A randomized controlled trial - SEMBTURBT

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000039119

Enrollment

Registered

2020-01-11

Start date

2017-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bladder carcinoma

Interventions

monopolar device for TURBT Bipolar device for TURBT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients undergoing TURBT for suspected bladder tumors

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Consent withdrawal, bladder tumour other than in the lateral wall, unfit for spinal anesthesia and need of general anesthesia or obturator nerve block.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Obturator Jerk	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
the bladder perforation, decrease in hemoglobin, decease in sodium, resection syndrome, resection time, need of re-operation for recoagulation, blood transfusion, hospital stay, detrussor muscle identification, and the severe artifact	—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public Contactmanish pradhan

TUTH UROLOGY

memanishp@gmail.com9851138833

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026