Comparison of the Effectiveness of Elastic and Rigit Taping Applications on Ankle Kinematics in Drop Landing in Patients with Lateral Ankle Injury

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Elastic and Rigit Taping Applications on Ankle Kinematics in Drop Landing in Patients with Lateral Ankle Injury - Comparison of the Effectiveness of Elastic and Rigit Taping Applications on Ankle Kinematics

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000038818

Enrollment

Registered

2019-12-12

Start date

2019-12-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lateral Ankle Injury

Interventions

elastic (kinesio taping) applications(group 1) rigit taping (athletic taping) applications (group 2) without any taping (group 3)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.18 to 65 years of age 2. To have a history of lateral ankle injury

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Those with neurological deficits, 2. Psychotherapeutic drug users, 3. Foot-ankle fracture or fracture history, 4. Those who have undergone inversion spraine in the last 6 weeks before enrollment, 5. Patients with neuromuscular disease that may affect test measurements and treatment, 6. Trauma that may interfere with lower extremity movement other than inversion spraine Patients with a surgical history. 7. BMI exceeding the obese limit (BMI> 35 kg / m2) )

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Ankle kinematic values at the first contact, full contact and first 150 ms after the first contact after landing	—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactHayri Yosmaoglu

Baskent University Ankara Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation

fztkorkusuz@hotmail.com(+90)5388675480

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026