FindTrial
Sign In

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of inhalation challenge tests for bird fancier's lung: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Diagnostic accuracy and safety of inhalation challenge tests for bird fancier's lung: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Diagnostic accuracy and safety of inhalation challenge tests for bird fancier's lung: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000038799
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2019-12-05
Start date
2019-12-05
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

bird fancier&#39

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Kameda Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Randomized control trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, or case-control studies assessing either the sensitivity and specificity of inhalation challenge tests among patients who were suspected of BFL, 2. Randomized control trials, prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, or case reports describing adverse reactions of inhalation challenge tests.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity and specificity of inhalation challenge tests—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complication after inhalation challenge tests—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactAkihiro Shiroshita

Kameda Medical Center Department of pulmonology

akihirokun8@gmail.com0470922211

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026