Skip to content

Esophageal dilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: RCT study between intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia

Esophageal dilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: RCT study between intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia - Esophageal dilation and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: RCT study between intravenous sedation vs general anesthesia

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000038698
Enrollment
50
Registered
2019-11-27
Start date
2019-02-28
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

esophageal cancer

Interventions

GA IV

Sponsors

Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Sonkla university
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: esophageal cancer

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: benign disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Total procedure time (from the time patient arrived in the operating room to the time the patient left) and actual procedure time (from endoscopy to wound closure) are recorded. Patients are reevaluated at 24 hours, 2 weeks, and 30 days after the procedure for postoperative complications and outcomes. Length of hospitalization after the procedure is also recorded. These charges are converted to cost and then analyzed. We only calculate the cost for the procedure and not that for total hospitalization. The cost is analyzed from the perspective of the hospital.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The cost is analyzed from the perspective of the hospital.

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactSomkiat Sunpaweravong

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Sonkla university general surgery

susomkia@medicine.psu.ac.th66869663780

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026