Skip to content

Intervertebral disc therapy using PRP-releasate

Intradiscal injection therapy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) - releasate for the patients with discogenic low back pain: Randomized control study - IDTPRCS

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000038536
Enrollment
20
Registered
2020-12-01
Start date
2018-02-20
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

low back pain

Interventions

Group A: PRP releasate, 2 mL, was injected through a syringe filer (Millex GV Filter unit, Cat. #SLGV M33 RS, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Group B: Betamethasone sodium phosphate (Rinderon, Sionogi
Co., LTD) (2 mg, 0.5 ml) + saline (1.5 ml)

Sponsors

Mie University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Having low back pain more than three month Visual analogue scare (VAS): more than 40% at baseline ODI: more than 40% at bassline Disc degeneration evaluated by MRI (more than grade II by Pfirrmann grading) from L3/4 to L4/5 lumbar disc Less than 50% decrease of disc height measurement by lumbar radiograph Discogenic pain evaluated by provocative discography Written informed consent is obtained from the participant of this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Having remarkable cauda equine and neuropathy symptom Having systematic or spinal infection Past-history of lumbar surgeries Past-history of interventional intervertebral disc therapy Having intervertebral instability evaluated by lumbar radiograph Patients having spondylolisthesis (more than grade I by Meyerding classification) Having neuro-muscular diseases, cerebral diseases, malignant tumor and blood coagulation disorders High risk for infectious diseases after the treatment Having anti-coagulant drugs at the time of treatment Pregnant patient Difficulty in participating throughout the evaluation period More than 10-points of BS-POS questionnaire test Contraindication for MRI Inappropriate patient for clinical study evaluate by doctors

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 8 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Percent change in VAS at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change and % change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change in VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) at 4, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Percent (%) change in VAS at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change and % change in ODI (Oswestry Disability Index) at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change and % change in the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change and % change in JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from VAS at baseline. Change in MRI grading at 26 and 52 weeks after the injection from bassline. Change in radiographic disc height at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection from that at baseline. Frequency and amount in use of short-term NSAIDs until 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the injection A successful ratio of the treatment at 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the treatment. *When the subjects receive the optional treatment, the secondary outcomes are evaluated at 4, 8, 12, 26, 52 weeks after the optional treatment.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKoji Akeda

Mie University Hospital Orthopaedic Surgery

k_akeda@clin.medic.mie-u.ac.jp059-231-5022

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026