Comparison between the classical and a new method for episiotomy repair

Comparison between the classical and a new method for episiotomy repair - Comparison between the classical and a new method for episiotomy repair: A clinical trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000038447

Enrollment

100

Registered

2019-11-01

Start date

2019-11-02

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinical trial

Interventions

Repair of episiotomy by the new method starting by deep muscles then superficial muscles then vaginal mucosa then skin Classical repair technique starts by vaginal mucosa then deep muscles then superf

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: All patients in normal vagunal delivery in need for episiotomy: Narrow vagina Primigravida Operative delivery Excessive fibrosis of perineum

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Refusal to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Hemotoma formation Fistula formation Repair time Blood loss	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Infection rate	—

Countries

Africa

Contacts

Public ContactAyman Dawood

Tanta University Obstetrics and gynecology

ayman.dawood@med.tanta.edu.eg+0201020972067

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026