Skip to content

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of romosozumab administration group and ibandronate sodium hydrate administration group for osteoporosis patients after denosumab treatment

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of romosozumab administration group and ibandronate sodium hydrate administration group for osteoporosis patients after denosumab treatment - Evaluation of efficacy and safety of romosozumab administration group and ibandronate sodium hydrate administration group for osteoporosis patients after denosumab treatment

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000037394
Enrollment
60
Registered
2019-07-17
Start date
2019-07-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

osteoporosis

Interventions

romosozumab group ibandronate sodium hydrate group

Sponsors

Shinshu University School of Medicine Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.All osteoporosis patients over 20 years old 2. Patients who have already received Denosumab (60 mg once every 6 months) for 2 years or more before the start of the study, and have a bone density value of -2.0 SD or more 3.Patients who received written informed consent based on their own free will after receiving sufficient explanation for participation in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. If you had previously been treated with romosozumab, ibandronate sodium hydrate 2. If you are allergic to romosozumab, ibandronate sodium hydrate 3. Those who have hypocalcemia 4. For pregnant women or women who are nursing 5.Patients with disorders that delay esophageal passage such as esophageal stricture or achalasia 6.Patients who can not keep standing or sitting for more than 60 minutes when taking 7. Those with severe renal dysfunction (eGFR 30 ml / min / less than 1.73 m2) or those receiving dialysis 8.Patients with upper digestive tract disorder such as dysphagia, esophagitis, gastritis, duodenitis, ulcer etc. 9. Other patients who the research director judged inappropriate as a subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Bone density at 12 months of treatment Younger average 80% achieved

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Occurrence of hypocalcemia Occurrence of other adverse events

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYukio Nakamura

Shinshu University School of Medicine Dept. of Orthopaedic Surgery

yxn14@aol.jp0263372659

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026