A motivational intervention for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study of occupational therapy.

A motivational intervention for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study of occupational therapy. - A motivational intervention for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study of occupational therapy.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000037324

Enrollment

Registered

2019-08-01

Start date

2019-07-10

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

stroke

Interventions

Before the intervention, therapists will modify the content of his/her standard occupational therapy based on the ARCS motivational model (Keller, 1984, 1987, 2009) in order to facilitate patients&#39

motivation for occupational therapy. The ARCS model is a problem solving approach to design the motivational aspects of learning environments to stimulate motivation to learn. Therapists will modif

s four criteria. (1) ATTENTION. Does the therapy design to gain patients&#39

attention? (e.g., use surprise or uncertainly to gain interest)? (2) RELEVANCE. Does the therapy design to establish relevance (e.g., provide information for future usefulness)? (3) CONFIDENCE. Does t

(4) SATISFACTION. Does the therapy design for patients to be satisfied or rewarded (e.g., praise)? As a reference, a list of motivational strategies (see the below list in the section of &quot

Other related information&quot

) will be presented to therapists. Therapist may utilize the list or may think of motivational strategies themselves. Stroke patients will receive 60 minutes/ days of the modified occupational thera

motivation.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Being between 30-180 days after first-ever stroke 2.Patients with unilateral upper limb motor paralysis (Fugl-Meyer Assessment<66) 3.Unilateral hemiparetic stroke without clear paralysis on the unaffected side 4.Ability to understand an instruction of the experimental procedure and execute motor and psychological tasks required in this study 5.Ability to remain seated independently 6.Consent to participate in this study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Limited range of motion, musculoskeletal impairments, and/or pain that affect motor tasks 2. Any other comorbid neurological disorder 3. Cognitive dysfunction including aphasia and dementia (MMSE < 24) 4. Mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate 5. patients who are considered to be inappropriate to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.A Questionnaire on the Feasibility of this interventional protocol 2.Number of adverse event 3.Number of drop out 4.Motor Activity Log(MAL) 5.Functional Independence Measure(FIM) 6.Self-rating Depression Scale(SDS) 7.Apathy Scale(AS) 8.MOtivation for Rehabilitation Scale(MORE) 9.Five scale rating on motivation for rehabilitation 10.Total time of Voluntary participation on an arm reaching task	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTaiki Yoshida

Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital Department of Rehabilitation

OTR.taiki.yoshida@gmail.com047-453-9010

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026