FindTrial
Sign In

A comparison of the hemodynamic stability between Inhaled general anesthesia and Total Intraveous Anesthesia (TIVA) undergoing coil embolization

A comparison of the hemodynamic stability between Inhaled general anesthesia and Total Intraveous Anesthesia (TIVA) undergoing coil embolization - hemodynamic stability

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000036951
Enrollment
2500
Registered
2019-06-05
Start date
2019-06-07
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

retrospective

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing coil embolization by Inhaled general anesthesia or Total Intraveous Anesthesia (TIVA) at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who underwent simultaneous neurosurgical procedures with intracranial aneurysm embolization

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
vital sign (BP,HR)—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
amount of used inotropics—

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactBo Young Kim

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

notinvasive@snubh.org82317873641

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026