Skip to content

The safety and efficacy of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis : A randomized controlled clinical trial

The safety and efficacy of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis : A randomized controlled clinical trial - The safety and efficacy of microwave ablation and radiofrequency ablation for colorectal cancer liver metastasis : A randomized controlled clinical trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000036206
Enrollment
104
Registered
2019-03-15
Start date
2019-02-15
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal liver metastasis

Interventions

Microwave ablation Radiofrequency ablation

Sponsors

Juntendo University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient at the age of 20 to 100 when the informed consent was obtained 2. Patient with histopathologically confirmed carcinoma or tumors showing characteristic imaging features of colorectal cancer liver metastasis 3. Tumors were unresectable or patient declined surgery 4. Three or fewer tumors, each 3 cm or less in diameter, or a solitary lesion, 5 cm or less in diameter (Patients with both primary and recurrent tumors were included. Patients with local tumor progression were excluded) 5. No extrahepatic metastasis or vascular invasion 6. Patient with written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient with platelet of 50,000/mm3 or less. Patient with PT of 50% or less. 2. Patient with refractory ascites and at high risk of peritoneal bleeding 3. Patient with enterobiliary reflux 4. Contrast-enhanced CT cannot be performed because of renal dysfunction (creatinine of 2 mg/dL or more) or allergic adverse reactions to iodine contrast agents 5. ASA's (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical score 3 or above 6. Patient who cannot accept necessary treatments, such as blood transfusion, because of religious reasons and others 7. Patient who cannot follow medical instructions because of dementia and others 8. Patient with tumors not visualized by ultrasonography or not accessible 9. Patient with adhesion between tumors and the gastrointestinal tract which may cause GI tract penetration or perforation 10.Patient with tumors adjacent to the major Glisson's capsule which may cause serious biliary injury or hepatic infarction 11.Patient not considered eligible to participate in this study by the attending doctor due to various reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary endpoint is the Modified RECIST evaluated by the CT scan taken after the first session of microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The secondary endpoints are 1) complete ablation ratio of tumors after the final session of of new-generation microwave ablation or radiofrequency ablation, 2) the number of sessions until completion of the treatment, and adverse event ratio.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactShuichiro Shiina

Juntendo University Department of Gastroenterology

sshiina@juntendo.ac.jp03-3813-3111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026