Comparison between conventional nasal intubation and Rhinoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation

Comparison between conventional nasal intubation and Rhinoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation - Comparison between conventional nasal intubation and Rhinoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000036120

Enrollment

100

Registered

2019-03-07

Start date

2019-03-07

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery requireing asleep nasotracheal intubation

Interventions

Rhinoscope-guided nasotracheal intubation Blind nasal passage without any device.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing general anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: bleeding disorder abnormal nasal cavity

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Degree of nasal bleeding Degree of sore throat Degree of resistance in nasal passage	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMidori Mogami

Ohara general hospital Department of anesthesiology

contralt.inutaro@gmail.com024-526-0300

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026