FindTrial
Sign In

Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Airtraq versus GlideScope for tracheal intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000036088
Enrollment
350
Registered
2020-01-01
Start date
2019-03-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Surgical patient with tracheal intubation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Saitama Medical University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Comparison between the Airtraq and the GlideScope in adults

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We excluded trials involving manikins, tracheal intubation performed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and the use of double-lumen tubes.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Success rate, glottic visualization, and intubation time, oral pharyngeal injury—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHiroshi Hoshijima

Saitama Medical University Hospital Anesthesiology

hhoshi6@gmail.com049-276-1271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026