Skip to content

Comparison of success rate of tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and McGRATH MAC by resident and anesthesiologist

Comparison of success rate of tracheal intubation with Macintosh laryngoscope and McGRATH MAC by resident and anesthesiologist - The effectiveness of the McGRATH MAC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000035550
Enrollment
30
Registered
2019-01-31
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients undergoing general anesthesia by tracheal intubation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Okazaki city hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients undergoing general anesthesia by tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Emergency operation Open heart surgery Isolated pulmonary ventilation case Laryngeal mask case Pregnant women Awake intubation by bronchoscope Naso-tracheal intubation Tracheostomy patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The success rate of tracheal intubation

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHidekazu Ito

Okazaki city hospital Department of Anesthesiology

oniheizo1745@gmail.com0564-21-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026