Skip to content

Comparison of real-time vs. professional continuous glucose monitoring related to calibration

Comparison of real-time vs. professional continuous glucose monitoring related to calibration - Comparison of real-time vs. professional continuous glucose monitoring related to calibration

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000035098
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-12-01
Start date
2018-12-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 diabetes

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Inuyama Chuo General Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with type 2 diabetes who wear Real-time CGM or professional CGM and whose preprandial and bedtime glucose levels from day 2 to day 5 are evaluated.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: judged to be unsuitable for participation for medical reasons

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
CaI (original index) of each 160 pair in real-time and professional CGM

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Relationship between CaI A (original index) and CaI B (original index) in real-time and professional CGM

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSoichi Takeishi

Inuyama Chuo General Hospital Diabetes

souichi19811225@yahoo.co.jp0568-62-8111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026