Skip to content

A comparison of Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo' with Humphrey Field Analyzer

A comparison of Head-Mounted Perimeter 'imo' with Humphrey Field Analyzer - A comparison of 'imo' with Humphrey

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000033262
Enrollment
200
Registered
2018-07-04
Start date
2018-06-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

glaucoma

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Okayama Univ. Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with glaucomatous visual field damage Test visual field with Humphrey Patients who are willing to participate in the study, and who are able to provide written informed consent Patients able to visit the medical institution at pre-defined visits

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: MD value of Humphrey < -30dB Patients who show best corrected decimal visual acuity less than 0.1

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement with MD values of 'imo' and Humphrey perimeter

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Test time for the two perimeters Fixation of eyes during the test for the two perimeters

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakako Miki

Okayama Univ. Hospital Ophthalmology

higo_oka@yahoo.co.jp086-235-7297

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026