Skip to content

Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study

Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study - Comparison of magnifying endoscopy with narrow band imaging (ME-NBI) attached balloon versus colposcopy for diagnosing cervical cancer, including acceptability of the endoscope: An exploratory prospective study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000033189
Enrollment
95
Registered
2018-06-29
Start date
2018-04-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasma, uteri cervical cancer

Interventions

Prior to colposcopy, endoscopic examination using ME-NBI and 3% acetic acid dispersion is attempted for approximately ten minutes.

Sponsors

Kochi Redcross Hospital
Lead Sponsor
Kagawa University Hospital, Osaka International Cancer Institute
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed as ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL or HSIL by pap smear, or more than CIN3 by colposcopy are included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Postoperative patients of cervical cancer, or patients with psychosis, or patients with pregnancy including suspicion are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Sensitivity for detecting the highest lesion which is CIN2 or more

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The visible rate of whole circumferential transition zone The proportion of visible internal cervical canal The complication rate Comparison of patient's tolerability on each examination using questionnaire The diagnostic accuracy of CIN at different stages (CIN1, CIN2, CIN3 or more) Specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CIN 2 or more detection

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKunihisa Uchita

Kochi Redcross Hospital Gastroenterology

ucchy31@yahoo.co.jp088-822-1201

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026