Comparing clinical efficacy of the media from human tubal fluid to the media currently used.

Comparing clinical efficacy of the media from human tubal fluid to the media currently used. - Comparing clinical efficacy of the media from human tubal fluid to the media currently used.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000033115

Enrollment

10000

Registered

2018-06-25

Start date

2017-09-19

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Infertility

Interventions

Culture and transfer embryos using the new media by June, 2020 Culture and transfer embryos using the conventional media by June, 2020

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Use embryos for this study only when normal fertilization is obtained after in vitro fertilization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: When none of normal embryos obtained, it is excluded from this study.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Compere the pregnancy rate following embryo transfer after using new media to using conventional media.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Observe the condition in embryo development, and obtain the rate of efficacy embryo between the two media.	—

Countries

Japan,Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactYoko Kumasako

St.Luke clinic Laboratory

ykumasa@st-luke.jp0975471234

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026