Skip to content

Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled trial

Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled trial - Is there a difference in recurrence of knee pain associated without apparent degenerative changes between the Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy and drag intervention: randomized controlled pilot trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000032922
Enrollment
20
Registered
2018-06-15
Start date
2018-07-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee pain

Interventions

8-week intervention with Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy etodolac x 2/day [200mg/day] for 8 weeks

Sponsors

Saitama Prefectural University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Outpatients coming to the Minami Shinjyuku Orthopedic Rehabilitation Clinic Kellgren Lawrence grade of 0-1, confirmed by an orthopaedic surgeon No contraindication for the use of etodolac Knee pain lasting for more than 1 month with the intensity of 4 or more in the 0-10 numerical rating scale

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Symptoms or movement impairments on the lower leg originated from tissues other than the knee Communication difficulties in Japanese Outpatients for the post-surgical management History of the Around the Knee Osteotomy or the Total Knee Arthroplasty

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Recruitment rate of the participants per month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Drop-out rate The number of intervention sessions of Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy for 8 weeks (1 and 2 months after the initiation of the intervention) Exercise compliance in the mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy arm for 8 weeks Treatment stages for the derangement syndrome in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy arm (reduction of derangement, maintain of the reduced derangement, recovery of function, education and maintenance) (1 and 2 months after the initiation of the intervention) Flexion/extension range of motion using a goniometer (pre intervention; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention) Subjective pain intensity (P4) (pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention) Quality of life (EQ5D)(pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention) Subjective disability (Patient Specific Functional Scale & Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) (pre intervention; and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention) Treatment effect (Global Rating Recovery Scale) (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11 and 14 months after the initiation of the intervention) Time for recurrence

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactSanshiro Hashimoto

Minami Shinjyuku Orthopedic Rehabilitation Clinic Orthopedic

sansho@msorc.jp0353020790

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026