Skip to content

Comparison of the burden on nurses and wheelchair-enabled patients due to different methods of toileting assistance with and without sit-to-stand lifts

Comparison of the burden on nurses and wheelchair-enabled patients due to different methods of toileting assistance with and without sit-to-stand lifts - Burden on nurses and wheelchair-enabled patients from different toileting assistance methods

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000032718
Enrollment
10
Registered
2018-05-26
Start date
2018-05-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy individuals

Interventions

toileting assistance method with sit-to-stand lift toileting assistance method without sit-to-stand lift

Sponsors

Kanagawa University of Human Services
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Nurses: Inpatient care experience of 3 years or more, and expertise in toileting assistance Simulated patients: Healthy individuals 65 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Nurses: Acute low back pain Simulated patient: individuals with motor disorder

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Muscle activity of surface EMG

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Goniometry Questionnaires

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYoshimi Kobayashi

Kanagawa University of Human Services School of Nursing, Faculty of Health & Social Services

wct.nurse.patient@gmail.com046-828-2500

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026