The feasibility of an algorithm utilization for anti-flare measures of frail elderly

The feasibility of an algorithm utilization for anti-flare measures of frail elderly - Frail elderly service matching project

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000032123

Enrollment

120

Registered

2018-04-06

Start date

2016-10-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frailty

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Those who participated in the project of connecting services to stay healthy, age over 65 years old; live in Kure City, Hiroshima prefecture; responded to the Kihon Checklist, who agreed to participate in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Not above

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
1.Types of services and usage frequency linked by intervention supports 2.Additional support, the types of existing and newly connected services and frequency of usage 3.Homebound score 4.Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Locomotive score 5.Psychological indicators: EuroQol-5D-5L score, Subjective sense of well-being 6.Physical indicators: alcohol intake (amount and frequency), presence of falls and fractures, exacerbation of existing diseases (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, stroke, dialysis introduction etc.), Onset of other diseases, Presence or absence of hospitalization/ reason/ emergency hospitalization or expected hospitalization/ frequency, facility entry, death, transference etc. 7.Presence or absence of nursing-care requirement/ Required degree of care/ Content of service use 8.Hospitalization (reason, number of times, period), facility entry/ transfer, death Evaluation period: baseline, 3 months(2016), 6 months, 12 months(2016)	—

Measure

Time frame

1.Types of services and usage frequency linked by intervention supports 2.Additional support, the types of existing and newly connected services and frequency of usage 3.Homebound score 4.Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Locomotive score 5.Psychological indicators: EuroQol-5D-5L score, Subjective sense of well-being 6.Physical indicators: alcohol intake (amount and frequency), presence of falls and fractures, exacerbation of existing diseases (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, stroke, dialysis introduction etc.), Onset of other diseases, Presence or absence of hospitalization/ reason/ emergency hospitalization or expected hospitalization/ frequency, facility entry, death, transference etc. 7.Presence or absence of nursing-care requirement/ Required degree of care/ Content of service use 8.Hospitalization (reason, number of times, period), facility entry/ transfer, death Evaluation period: baseline, 3 months(2016), 6 months, 12 months(2016)

—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKanae Osaki

Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences major Department of Nursing Science

kanae-osaki@hiroshima-u.ac.jp082-255-5367

Outcome results