Consideration of tear embironment and bacterial detection rate by the difference of lacrimal washing methods after lacrimal operation

Consideration of tear embironment and bacterial detection rate by the difference of lacrimal washing methods after lacrimal operation - Consideration of tear embironment and bacterial detection rate by difference of postoperating lacrimal washing methods

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000031981

Enrollment

Registered

2018-04-01

Start date

2017-11-06

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

lacrimal obstructive disease

Interventions

lacrimal washing by saline solution every 2 weeks during 2 months after surgery lacrimal washing by 0.25% iodine solution every 2 weeks during 2 months after surgery

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients who undergone lacrimal tube implantation surgery for lacrimal obstructive disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: iodine allergy not obtein informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Lacrimal tube infection rate and bacterial detection rate 2 months after surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Reocclusion rate 1 year after surgery Tear film environment pre and 2 months after the surgery; slit-lamp examination, shirmer-1 test, tear meniscus height and area with OCT, strip meniscometry ,tear osmolarity and tearfilm inflammation	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactOsamu Ishihara

Saitama Medical university Hospital IRB Committee Secretariat

mganka@saitama-med.ac.jp049-276-1354

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026