Skip to content

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials - Superiority comparative test of conventional treatment vs naldemedine for prevention of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: Investigator initiated, single center, 2 arm, open label, randomized controlled trials

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000031891
Enrollment
120
Registered
2018-03-25
Start date
2018-03-26
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer patients prescribing opioids

Interventions

Magnesium oxide Naldemedine

Sponsors

Yokohama city university hospotal
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1,Patients aged 20 to 85 years of age at the time of acquisition. 2,Gender, hospitalization / outpatient: no question 3,Patients who are not undergoing opioid analgesic treatment 4,Patients scheduled to use opioids due to cancer pain 5,Patients who can take oral medicine, meals and drinks 6,Patient who can be evaluated by patient diary (Surrogate record to patient's diary is permitted only when patient's own evaluation is possible) 7,Patients who are expected to have stable cancer pathology during the observation period 8,Patient who got written consent from participants to participate in this research, observe observance matter participating in this research, undergo examination prescribed in this research plan, and can declare symptoms etc.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1,Patients who are contraindicated in the package inserts of magnesium oxide and naldemedine and patients who have a history of hypersensitivity to the components of this drug. 2,Serious structural abnormalities of the digestive tract (eg mechanical ileus), diseases affecting intestinal transport (eg paralytic ileus, peritoneal dissemination affecting gastrointestinal function, peritoneal cancer, uncontrolled thyroid function decline (IBS), inflammatory bowel disease (eg ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease), active diverticular disease, pelvic disorders causing constipation (uterine prolapse, rectal prolapse, defecation A patient with uterine fibroids affecting). Also, even if these diseases are cured at present, patients judged by doctors to affect digestive tract function 3,Patient who is breastfeeding or may be pregnant. 4,Patients who underwent surgery that affects gastrointestinal function, treatment (eg nerve block) or radiotherapy affecting gastrointestinal function within 28 days from the date of registration or patients scheduled to be performed during the observation period

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PAC-QOL overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1,PAC-SYM overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 2,CSS overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 3,Difference in the presence or absence of constipation by Rome IV (all observation period) after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 4,Bristol scale overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 5,SMBs overall score difference after 2 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 6,PAC-QOL overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 7,PAC-SYM overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 8,CSS overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 9,Difference in the presence or absence of constipation by Rome IV (all observation period) after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 10,Bristol scale overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 11,SMBs overall score difference after 12 weeks of treatment start from Baseline. 12,Oral compliance rate

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakaomi Kessoku

Yokohama city university hospotal Palliative care

takaomi0027@gmail.com0457872640

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026