Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs for improving the subjective well-being of healthy individuals: a randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs for improving the subjective well-being of healthy individuals: a randomized wait-list controlled trial. - Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based programs for improving the subjective well-being of healthy individuals: a randomized wait-list controlled trial.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000031885

Enrollment

Registered

2018-03-27

Start date

2018-05-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

healthy individuals

Interventions

8 weekly sessions based on Mindfulness-based program no interventions (waiting-list)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: /No past history of mental disorders or with history but have been remitted longer than 2 years /Score of SWLS is 24 or lower /Able to consent in writing

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: /Difficult to follow up for 4 months after start of intervention /Past history of mindfulness based intervention /Severe physical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
The difference in mean change scores at 8 weeks from baseline on the Satisfaction With Life Scale between groups.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
(1)The difference in mean change scores at 4,8,16 weeks from baseline on FS, SPANE, RSES, FFMQ, the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale, SCS, QIDS, GAD7, PSS, HPQ Short Form Japanese final, MAIA, EQ-5D-5L between groups. With respect to cost-effective analysis, effectiveness and cost will be evaluated by QALY or other clinical scale, and the cost for intervention respectively. (2)The difference in mean change scores at 4,16 weeks from baseline on the Satisfaction With Life scale between groups.	—

Measure

Time frame

(1)The difference in mean change scores at 4,8,16 weeks from baseline on FS, SPANE, RSES, FFMQ, the Connor Davidson Resilience Scale, SCS, QIDS, GAD7, PSS, HPQ Short Form Japanese final, MAIA, EQ-5D-5L between groups. With respect to cost-effective analysis, effectiveness and cost will be evaluated by QALY or other clinical scale, and the cost for intervention respectively. (2)The difference in mean change scores at 4,16 weeks from baseline on the Satisfaction With Life scale between groups.

—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMitsuhiro Sado

Keio University School of Medicine Department of Neuropsychiatry

mitsusado@keio.jp+81-(0)3-5363-3971

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026