Comparing Catheter Delivery System and Stylet Delivery System during implanting Ventricular Lead -A Randomized Trial-

Comparing Catheter Delivery System and Stylet Delivery System during implanting Ventricular Lead -A Randomized Trial- - Comparing Catheter Delivery System and Stylet Delivery System during implanting Ventricular Lead

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000031849

Enrollment

100

Registered

2018-04-01

Start date

2018-04-18

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who need a pacemaker for atrioventricular block or bradycardia due to atrial fibrillation

Interventions

Intervention duration:During lead implantation Device:Comparing catheter delivery system and stylet delivery system

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who need a pacemaker implantation for atrio-ventricular block or bradycardia due to atrial fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients who already have a medical device at the planned implantation site Patients who were unsuitable for transvenous pacemaker implantation

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Attempt needed to implant the lead	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time for lead implantation Total radiation exposure dose for lead implantation Need for change of implantation methods or change of physician to achieve lead implantation Number of lead perforation Number of lead dislodgment, need for re-positioning the 1 month after the implantation	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKenichiro Yamagata

National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center Division of Cardiology

look.cardiology@gmail.com06-6833-5012

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026