Comparison of thin and standard aspiration needle in endobronchial urtlasound-guided transbronchial aspiration

Comparison of thin and standard aspiration needle in endobronchial urtlasound-guided transbronchial aspiration - Comparison of aspiration needle in EBUS-TBNA

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000031389

Enrollment

Registered

2018-02-20

Start date

2018-01-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung cancer

Interventions

Perform EBUS-TBNA with two passes using 25G EchoTip ProCore neeedle.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients judged inappropriate by the attending

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Comparison of the diagnostic adequacy between 25G aspiration needle and 22G aspiration needle	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of histological core tissue procurement, quality of histological core tissue, treatment time, adverse events	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKozo Yoshimori

Fukujuji Hospital, Japan Anti-Tubeculosis Association Department of respiratory medicine

yoshimorik@fukujuji.org042-491-4111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026