Skip to content

Comparison of clinical efficacy between fluticasone propionate/ formoterol (FFC) and fluticasone furoate/ vilanterol (VFC) in patients with asthma

Comparison of clinical efficacy between fluticasone propionate/ formoterol (FFC) and fluticasone furoate/ vilanterol (VFC) in patients with asthma - Comparison of clinical efficacy between FFC and VFC

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000031039
Enrollment
40
Registered
2018-01-29
Start date
2018-01-29
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bronchial Asthma

Interventions

Flutiform (20 patients) Brand name: Flutiform125 Aerosol Moderate dose: 500 micrograms per day Study Period: 24 weeks Frequency: 2 inhalations per dose, 2 times per day Relvar (20 patients)

Sponsors

Ikeda Clinic
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients diagnosed with bronchial asthma according to Japanese guideline for asthma (The Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline 2015) 2. Outpatients (men and women) at least 20 years of age who can give informed consent 3. Patients who have been using ICS monotherapy for at least 4 weeks prior to Visit 1, are insufficiently or poorly controlled on ICS monotherapy, and can switch to Flutiform or Relvar 4. Patients with severe persistent asthma and whose present treatment classifies as step 2 or step 3 according to the Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline 2015 (classification of asthma severity based on the present treatment) 5. Patients who are insufficiently or poorly controlled according to the Asthma Prevention and Management Guideline 2015

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with evident ACO or COPD comorbidities 2. Patients with antibiotic-resistant infections, deep mycosis, or tuberculosis disease 3. Patients who have been afflicted with a respiratory infection (viral infection) within 8 weeks prior to enrollment 4. Patients with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years 5. Patients who have experienced side effects from the use of ICS, LABA or the combined medications 6. Patients who have used systemic steroids within 4 weeks prior to enrollment 7. Patients with significant heart, liver, kidney disease or other clinically significant comorbidities 8. Patients who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant during the study period 9. Other patients who are judged unsuitable for inclusion by the investigators in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Period until patients insufficiently or poorly controlled on ICS therapy are determined to be well-controlled by switching to ICS/LABA therapy Evaluation at 24 Week visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
-Pulmonary functions Evaluation at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 Week visit -symptoms During research period -peak flow meter During research period <Control level> -JGL Evaluation at 0 and 24 Week visit -ACQ Evaluation at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 Week visit -JACS Evaluation at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 Week visit -Simulation for the percentage of patients/period of time until patients become well-controlled using ACQ/JACS Evaluation at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 Week visit -Device operability questionnaire Evaluation at 0 and 24 Week visit -Correlation between control level and symptoms -Control level (ACQ/JACS) Evaluation at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 Week visit

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKenji Ikeda

Increase Co., Ltd. Clinical Development Department

jtsuchiya@sa-tt.co.jp03-5312-5026

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026