Skip to content

Multicenter validation study on computer-aided diagnostic system for endocytoscopic image in diagnosis of colrectal lesions

Multicenter validation study on computer-aided diagnostic system for endocytoscopic image in diagnosis of colrectal lesions - EndoBRAIN STUDY

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000028843
Enrollment
30000
Registered
2017-09-04
Start date
2017-11-10
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal lesion

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Colorectal lesions with a maximum diameter of 10 mm or less which were observed and resected by CF-Y0058I at the digestive desease center of Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, and were capable of pathological evaluation. Regarding the use of image data, a case in which written consent was obtained from the patient himself before the endoscopic examination. At the time of endoscopic image photographing, patients who are 30 to 80 years of age. The leision from which white light image, ultra-high magnifying image and ultra-high magnifying NBI images are all acquired.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Lesions from patients with inflammatory bowel disease(broad sense). Non-epithelial lesion(carcinoid tumor, malignant lymphoma) Sessile serrated adenoma/polyp In case that, each ultra-high magnifying image, ultra-high magnifying NBI and white light image can not be evaluated because of unclear image. Because of strong image artifacts, diagnosis is impossible with EndoBRAIN(output as Not a Good Sample or Low confidence). Lesions with multiple different pathological components within the same lesion.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1.Confirm the accuracy of diagnosis in the case of using a ultra-high magnified staining image in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 10 mm or less.(Verification that EndoBRAIN is superior to non-specialist in diagnostic accuracy) 2.Confirm the specificity of diagnosis in the case of using a ultra-high magnified staining image in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 10 mm or less.(Verification that EndoBRAIN is superior to non-specialist in diagnostic accuracy) 3.Confirm the accuracy of diagnosis in the case of using a ultra-high magnified narrow-banding image(NBI) in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 10 mm or less.(Verification that EndoBRAIN is superior to non-specialist in diagnostic accuracy) 4.Confirm the specificity of diagnosis in the case of using a ultra-high magnified narrow-banding image (NBI) in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 10 mm or less.(Verification that EndoBRAIN is superior to non-specialist in diagnostic accuracy)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Accuracy of distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm of 10 mm or less colorectal lesion. 2.Whether either of diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV of EndoBRAIN exceeds 90% in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in 10 mm or less lesion. 3.Whether either of diagnosis accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV of EndoBRAIN exceeds 90% in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in 5 mm or less lesion. 4.In case of diagnostic confidence is high, whether the negative predictive value for diagnosing 5 mm or less lesions in the rectum and sigmoid colon is more than 90%. 5.In case of diagnostic confidence is high, whether the each of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV value for diagnosing colorectal lesion using EndoBRAIN for distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in 10 mm or less lesion exceeds 90%. 6.In case of diagnostic confidence is high, whether the each of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV or NPV for diagnosing colorectal lesion using EndoBRAIN for distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in 5 mm or less lesion exceeds 90%. 7.Time required for diagnosis. 8.Reproducibility in EndoBRAIN diagnosis 9.Verification that EndoBRAIN is superior to non-specialist in results of specificity, PPV and NPV for distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 10 mm or less. 10.Verification that EndoBRAIN has better diagnostic results than non-specialists in each of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV in distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm in colorectal lesion of 5 mm or less. 11.In the case of diagnosis confidence is high, verification that EndoBRAIN has better diagnostic results than non-specialists in each of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV of distinguishing neoplasm from non-neoplasm of colorectal lesion of 5 mm or less. *In the secondary outcomes, the diagnostic abilities of both the staining and narrow-band unltra-high magnifying image are each evaluated.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYuichi Mori

Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital Digestive Disease Center

ibusiginjp@gmail.com045-949-7000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026