FindTrial
Sign In

Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000028751
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2017-08-20
Start date
2017-08-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who need tracheal intubation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Saitama Medical University Hospital
Lead Sponsor
Teikyo University School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare,Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Tohoku university
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who need tracheal intubation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: children, Use of double lumens

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
intubation success rate, intubation time, and glottis visualization.—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHiroshi Hoshijima

Saitama Medical University Hospital Anesthesiology

hhoshi@saitama-med.ac.jp049-276-1271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026