Skip to content

Comparative Study of Overdentures Retained by Cylindrical and Conical Telescopic Attachments in cases with few Remaining Teeth

Comparative Study of Overdentures Retained by Cylindrical and Conical Telescopic Attachments in cases with few Remaining Teeth - Comparative Study of Overdentures Retained by Cylindrical and Conical Telescopic Attachments

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000028680
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-08-16
Start date
2017-08-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients with few remaining teeth

Interventions

Overdenture retained by cylindrical telescopic attachments Overdenture retained by conical telescopic attachments

Sponsors

Damascus University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with few remaining teeth (2-4 teeth) 2. The remaining teeth should be distributed in both sides of jaw 3. The remaining teeth shouldnt include molars

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Remaining teeth with considerable mobility 2. Remaining teeth with severe bone loss 3. Remaining teeth are not distributed in both sides of jaw

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Masticatory efficiency 2. Some periodontal indicators (PD, CAL, abutment teeth mobility, alveolar bone loss)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Dentures underlying mucosa evaluation 2. Technical failure rates 3. Abutments other evaluations 4. Patient satisfaction

Countries

Asia(except Japan)

Contacts

Public ContactMohammad Ayham Hakkoum

Damascus university - Faculty of Dentistry Removable Prosthodontics

drayham@yahoo.com00963932071296

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026