Gastric cancer
Conditions
Interventions
Take pre-test, watch video lecture, and take post-test1. Then, take self-training tests, and take post-test2.
Take pre-test, watch video lecture, and take post-test1. Then, take post-test2.
Sponsors
Osaka International Cancer Institute
Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: Endoscopists who provided consent to participate in the study.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: None.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The difference of diagnostic accuracy in post-test2. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| 1. The difference in the degree of improvement in the post-test1 and post-test2 according to pre-test score, experience of endoscopy and institutional difference. 2. The changes in diagnostic accuracy between Pre-test and Post-test1. 3. The changes in diagnostic accuracy throughout self-training test program in every 10 cases. 4. Relationship between depth of invasion and the following endoscopic features: tumor location, macroscopic type, tumor size, histological type and endoscopic findings (non-extension sign, remarkable redness, uneven surface, margin elevation, and enlarged folds). | — |
Countries
Japan
Contacts
Public ContactMinoru Kato
Osaka International Cancer Institute Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Outcome results
None listed