Diverse in PTH values measured by CLIA and ECLIA methods: the influence on managing indicators of CKD patients

Diverse in PTH values measured by CLIA and ECLIA methods: the influence on managing indicators of CKD patients - PTH measuring methods and management of CKD

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000028289

Enrollment

700

Registered

2022-04-01

Start date

2016-12-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

chronic kidney disease

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: CKD patients at dialysis and predialysis stages

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: patients whose agreements had not been obtained

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
An correlation between values of intact PTH measured by ECLIA and CLIA methods, and a basic data to convert them each other	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
An estimation of effective managing indicator of CKD in cases of using CLIA method for measuring intact PTH	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakatoshi Kakuta

Tokai University Hachioji Hospital Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism

kakuta@tokai.ac.jp042-639-1111

Outcome results