Stick method versus non-stick method for anesthesia of transnasal endoscopy: a prospective randomized, comparative study

Stick method versus non-stick method for anesthesia of transnasal endoscopy: a prospective randomized, comparative study - Stick method versus non-stick method for anesthesia of transnasal endoscopy: a prospective randomized, comparative study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000028084

Enrollment

1500

Registered

2017-08-01

Start date

2017-08-01

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

upper gastrointestinal disease

Interventions

Nasal endoscopy using stick method for anesthesia Nasal endoscopy using non-stick method for anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cases evaluated by unsadated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cases with severe complications are excluded

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
VAS scale of patient's acceptance after nasal endoscopic examination: stick vs non-stick method for anesthesia	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, procedure time, success rate and nasal bleeding: stick vs non-stick method for anesthesia	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMatsuzaki Ippei

Medical corporation Yamashita Hospital Gastroenterology

imatsu@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp0586-45-4511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026