Skip to content

Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation

Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation - Comparison of airway management by using LMA Protector with that of LMA Supreme in the clinical situation

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000027820
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-06-20
Start date
2017-06-21
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who will be planned to the operation

Interventions

The Group which using LMA Protector The Group which using LMA Supreme

Sponsors

Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The patients who will be planned to the operations

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The patients with trauma, ileum, abdominal cavity inflammation, peristalsis dysfunction, gatroesophageal reflux, severe obesity (> BMI 35), difficult mutual understanding, failed to agree with this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
with or without of postoperative throat, Numerical Rating Score (NRS)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKouji Hamaya

Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine Hospital section

ko-hamaya-923@sapmed.ac.jp011-611-2111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026