FindTrial
Sign In

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews for Prediction Modeling Studies of Clinical Research in PROSPERO

Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews for Prediction Modeling Studies of Clinical Research in PROSPERO - Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modeling Studies

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000026103
Enrollment
50
Registered
2017-02-14
Start date
2017-02-18
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hospital Care Research Unit, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Higashi-Naniwa-Cho 2-17-77, Amagasaki, Hyogo 660-8550, Japan.
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: PROSPERO (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/) registered published systematic reviews of prognostic modeling studies until 18th February in 2017. We will include systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies consistent with the scope of CHARMS checklist. We will include prediction model development studies without external validation aim to develop a prognostic or diagnostic prediction model from the dataset at hand; prediction model development studies with external validation in independent data; external model validation studies with or without model updating (1). (1) Moons KGM, de Groot JAH, Bouwmeester W, Vergouwe Y, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: We will exclude prediction studies exploring which predictors independently contribute to the prediction of a particular outcome as well as studies aimed at quantifying the impact of using a prediction model (1). (1) Moons KGM, de Groot JAH, Bouwmeester W, Vergouwe Y, Mallett S, Altman DG, et al. Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
We plan to describe the reporting characteristics using the PRSIMA checklist. In addition, we plan to describe relevant items refered in CHARM checklist.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We will compare characteristics of Cochrane protocol versus non-Cochrane review protocols, and the sample published prior to 2015 versus after 2015.—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHiraku Tsujimoto

Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center Hospital Care Research Unit

hira_to_ber-trialregistry@yahoo.co.jp06-6480-7000

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026