FindTrial
Sign In

The McGrath versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The McGrath versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Comparison of McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscope

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Unknown
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000025882
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2017-06-22
Start date
2017-01-27
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

The patients with tracheal intubation

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Saitama Medical University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: The paper with prospective randomized trials which compared the McGrath with the Macintosh laryngoscope.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The success rate, the intubation time, glottis visualization and complications in tracheal intubation—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactHiroshi Hoshijima

Saitama Medical University Hospital Anesthesiology

hhoshi@saitama-med.ac.jp049-276-1271

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026