FindTrial
Sign In

Patient's acceptance of unsedated transnasal endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy: a prospective raodomized comparative study

Patient's acceptance of unsedated transnasal endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy: a prospective raodomized comparative study - Patient's acceptance of unsedated transnasal endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000025848
Enrollment
300
Registered
2017-02-01
Start date
2017-02-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

upper gastrointestinal disease

Interventions

Conventional endoscopy using EG-L600WR7 Nasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7 Nasal endoscopy using GIF-H290N

Sponsors

Medical corporation Yamashita Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Cases evaluated by unsadated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Cases with severe complications are excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
VAS scale of patient's acceptance after endoscopic examination: conventinal endoscopy using EG-L600WR7 vs transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7, transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7 vs GIF-H290N—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The autonomic nervous responses were determined from heart-rate variations: HF power/LF power and Log HF power during examination. Systolic blood pressure and pulse rate. Procedure time during and after examinatioGagging: conventinal endoscopy using EG-L600WR7 vs transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7, transnasal endoscopy using EG-L580NW7 vs GIF-H290N—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactIppei Matsuzaki

Medical corporation Yamashita Hospital Gastroenterology

imatsu@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp0586-45-4511

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026