Which is useful monitor for detecting apnea between respiratory sound and plethysmography in patients during ESD of gastrointestinal tract?

Which is useful monitor for detecting apnea between respiratory sound and plethysmography in patients during ESD of gastrointestinal tract? - Which monitor is superior to detect apnea during ESD?

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000025421

Enrollment

Registered

2016-12-28

Start date

2017-01-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who performed ESD of gastrointestinal tract.

Interventions

None listed

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: none

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: none

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Frequency of alarm of showing SpO2 less than90%, Respiratory rate (RR) less than10 breathes per min or apnea	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
1. Differences of RR measuring by 3 monitors using respiratory sound, plethysmography and ETCO2 2. Changes of RR by sedatives 3. Differences of sensitivity of respiratory depression and apnea by 3 monitors 4. Depth of sedation	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTomoko Fukada

Tokyo Women's Medical University, School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology

fukada.tomoko@twmu.ac.jp03-3353-8111

Outcome results