Skip to content

The influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinical clinicians' impression of the intervention: randomized controlled trial

The influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinical clinicians' impression of the intervention: randomized controlled trial - DOCTOR study(Do Overstated Conclusions Trick Our Readers?)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000025317
Enrollment
510
Registered
2016-12-18
Start date
2017-01-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Clinicians

Interventions

Volunteers are directed to the DOCTOR study website specially made for this research. Once they register, participants will be automatically randomly assigned to either of the two arms (with overstate
With&quot
abstract exaggerates the abstract conclusion section in favor of intervention. &quot
Without&quot
group participants will read the abstract that was rewritten by investigators to remove the overstatement. We will select five abstracts from the pre-existing database of published reports in psy
group participants will read the abstract that was rewritten by investigators to remove the overstatement. For the control &quot
without&quot
arm, we will rewri

Sponsors

Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We will recruit volunteers among members of Japan Primary Care Association by invitation e-mails. Interested individuals can access to the DOCTOR study site via the link attached to the invitation e-mail. They are asked to give particulars and answer the screening questions and if they meet the inclusion criteria and agree to participate, then they will proceed to the next page and start the session. The screening criteria are as follows: 1. A member of Japan Primary Care Association 2. Medical doctor 3. With clinical practice of more than 2 years 4. Currently in clinical practice 5. Have chance to get information on new clinical research/trials

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Medical doctors who mainly work at research laboratories or educational institutions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of the effectiveness of the intervention discussed in the given abstract. The answers will be given on a scale of 0-10. 1.How likely do you think that Intervention A would be beneficial to patients? (0: not at all 10: very likely)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2. How likely do you think this conclusion is valid? (0: not at all 10: very likely) 3. How likely do you want to read the full text of this study? (0: not at all 10: very likely) 4. When you answered the above questions, which part of the abstract did you refer to the most? ( background / methods / results / conclusion)

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKiyomi Shinohara

Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior

doctor.study.pc@gmail.com075-753-9491

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026