Comparison of the effectiveness of Laryngeal Mask Proseal and DAMS TuLip in the patients of chin-tuck position assumed halo vest fixation.

Comparison of the effectiveness of Laryngeal Mask Proseal and DAMS TuLip in the patients of chin-tuck position assumed halo vest fixation. - Comparison of the effectiveness of Laryngeal Mask Proseal and DAMS TuLip in the patients of chin-tuck position.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000024857

Enrollment

Registered

2016-11-16

Start date

2013-10-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

difficult airway

Interventions

using Laryngeal mask Proseal at the induction of the general anesthesia using DAMS TuLip at the induction of the general anesthesia

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Adult patient of ASA physical status 1~3. 2.Patients that their chin will be tucked naturally when in the supine position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Hemorrhagic diathesis in mouth or pharynx 2.Full stomach 3.Cases that the investigator decided as inappropriate

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Picture of the glottis through the device at the time of device insertion.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactTakanobu Uesugi

Kawanishi City Hospital department of anesthesia

uesugi5082@yahoo.co.jp072-794-2321

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026