Comparison of double-lumen tracheal tube between Airwayscope and McGRATH MAC; randomized controlled trial

Comparison of double-lumen tracheal tube between Airwayscope and McGRATH MAC; randomized controlled trial - Comparison of double-lumen tracheal tube between Airwayscope and McGRATH MAC

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

JPRN

Registry ID

JPRN-UMIN000024740

Enrollment

Registered

2016-11-07

Start date

2016-11-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients who undergo respiratory surgery.

Interventions

Double lumen tube intubation using Airwayscope. Double lumen tube intubation using McGRATH

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients who are planned to undergo respiratory surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients for emergency surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Intubation efficacy(intubation time, number of tracheal intubation, number of laryngoscopy.)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Incidence of pharyngeal pain and hoarseness. Subjective difficulty of laryngoscopy and tracheal tube passage through the glottis.	—

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactNobuyasu Komasawa

Osaka Medical College Anesthesiology

ane078@osaka-med.ac.jp0726-84-6361

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026