Skip to content

A study for efficacy of new operation of stimulation at suprapubic and paravertebral zone in infant for collection of urine.

A study for efficacy of new operation of stimulation at suprapubic and paravertebral zone in infant for collection of urine. - OSICCO study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000024231
Enrollment
200
Registered
2016-10-01
Start date
2016-10-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Good condition

Interventions

A technique for collection of urine, a gentle tapping in the suprapubic area and stimulation of the lumbar paravertebral zone in the lower back.

Sponsors

Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medic Department of General Pediatrics
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1.Patients admitted infants aged under 24 months who were registered. 2.Patients who were obtained oral consent to the study by parents or legal parents.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1.Patient who have completed toilet training. 2.Patient who have abnormality in body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, SpO2 or consciousness. 3.Hospitalized patient with urinary tract infection. 4.Patient with known dysuria. 5.Patient with known vesicoureteral reflux. 6.Patient who has HOT (Home oxygen therapy). 7.Patient who havs tracheostomy. 8.Patient who has apneic episode. 9.Neuromuscular disease patient except febrile convulsion. 10.Patient who indicated chromosome aberration. 11.Patient with wounds in the abdomen or back that does not heal. 12.Patient who will be discharged within 3 days. 13.Attending physician does not be in charge of the patient over 24 hours. 14.Attending physician considers inappropriate for the patient.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
A proportion of children from whom we can get his/her urine within 5 minutes by the technique.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1.Comparison of background factors of the group who could urinate and could not 2.Distribution of time of up to urination 3.Proportion of urine occult blood positive in the group that could urinate 4.Proportion of urine protein-positive group that could urinate 5.Proportion of positive for bacterial urine whose urine was obtained. 6.Proportion of the success bacteria were detected by culture:proportion of asymptomatic bacterial urine,and proportion of contamination urine. 7.Proportione of adverse events:patient cry during bladder stimulation, the stimulation give damage to their skin.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactMidori Tanikawa

Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center Department of General Pediatrics

midori_miura@tmhp.jp042-300-5111

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026