Skip to content

The efficacy of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on communication and skilled motor function of children

The efficacy of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on communication and skilled motor function of children - The efficacy of repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation on communication and skilled motor function of children

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000024216
Enrollment
20
Registered
2016-11-01
Start date
2017-03-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

autism spectrum disorder

Interventions

Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold and 900 pulses for one session was given to the following brain regions in the following order at the

Sponsors

Osaka University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Male

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Boys who were diagnosed as autism spectrum disorder in the clinic of developmental disorders in Osaka University Hospital. The diagnosis was made by specialists in child neurology or psychiatry according to the DSM-V (The Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders), ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview, Revised) which is a specific interview form to the parent with ASD, or AODS (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule) which is a specific observation tool for autism diagnosis. 2. Children in whom organic brain abnormality or epileptic abnormality were denied by MRI and EEG examination performed less than two and one year prior to rTMS, respectively. 3. Children with IQ more than 80. 4. Right-handed children judged by Edinburgh Handedness Inventory. 5. Children with age of 10 to 15 years when consent are obtained. Written informed consent should be obtained after the detailed explanation.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Those who suffer from physical comorbid disorders except developmental disorders. 2. Those who have any instrument including metal in the head except oral cavity. 3. Those who have a history of heart, gastrointestinal, chronic renal diseases, head trauma or brain tumors. 4. Those who were instrumented with a cardiac pacemaker, a deep brain or a spinal stimulation or drug-delivery pump. 5. Those who possess intracranial organic lesions and at increased risk for induction of convulsion. 6. Those who have a history of convulsive diseases including febrile seizures, epileptic seizures or epilepsy. 7. Those who take medicine that decrease the convulsive threshold such as anti-depressant, anti-psycotic or anti-histamine drugs. 8. Those who is judged to be not suitable for participating in the study by responsible or contributing doctors.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1. Outcome for efficacy (evaluated on the day when rTMS is performed) a. coordinated upper limb movement evaluated by Trace Coder b. Motor evoked potential c. Sociocognitive function evaluated by GazeFinder 2. Outcome for safety a. the occurrence of adverse events and their extent

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1. Outcome for efficacy (evaluated on the day when rTMS is performed) Global motor function evaluated by movement assessment battery for children 2 (M-ABC2) 2. Outcome for saftey The occurrence of severe adverse events at each site of stimulation

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactKuriko Shimono

Osaka University Hospital Pediatrics

kuriko@ped.med.osaka-u.ac.jp06-6879-3863

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026