Skip to content

Validity and effect of lower extremity orthosis with simple sensor in patients with hemiparesis

Validity and effect of lower extremity orthosis with simple sensor in patients with hemiparesis - Validity and effect of lower extremity orthosis with simple sensor in patients with hemiparesis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
JPRN
Registry ID
JPRN-UMIN000024152
Enrollment
25
Registered
2016-10-10
Start date
2016-11-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

healthy controls patients with hemiparesis due to stroke

Interventions

The patients with hemiparesis due to stroke and healthy controls wearing hip and ankle orthosises walk along a 7m walkway under nine conditions of elastic dampars. The subjects walk along a 7m walkwa

Sponsors

Tohoku University
Lead Sponsor
NEC Corporation
Collaborator

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) The inclusion criteria for subjects with hemiparesis due to stroke were as follows: 1) unilateral cerebral lesions confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging; 2) the ability to walk at least 7 m without assistive devices; 3) the ability to follow verbal commands; 4) 20 years of age or more; and 5) performing rehabilitation at Tohoku university hospital. The inclusion criteria for controls included 2) and 3).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: The subjects with hemiparesis and controls were excluded if they had the following: 1) diabetic peripheral neuropathy; 2) a history of orthopedic problems; 3) brainstem or cerebellar lesions; and 4) unilateral spactial neglect.The score of visuospatial perception in SIAS(stroke impairment assessmnet set) is less than 2. The exclusion criteria for controls were as follows: 1) a history of a disorder of the central nervous system and peripheral neuropathy and 2) a history of orthopedic problems.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The comparison of the kinematic and kinetic parameters among the conditions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The consistency of the data that are measured using three dimensional motion analysis system and that are measured using the newly developed sensor.

Countries

Japan

Contacts

Public ContactYusuke Sekiguchi

Tohoku University Hospital Department of Rehabilitation

yusuke5547@yahoo.co.jp022-717-7677

Outcome results

None listed

Source: JPRN (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026